USBM Lives: A Report

During the past couple of weeks I’ve blown my monthly entertainment budget on shows. I’ll refrain from talking about the Todd Snider/Hayes Carll extravaganza here as this isn’t a post about alternative country music (except to say that if you have a chance to see either of them dudes, you should). This is, instead, a post about United States black metal. Seeing as how three of the bands I saw this month, Agalloch, Nachtmystium, and Kreig, are a big deal in that world, I figure it’s that time.

One of the things about back metal that makes it so interesting is that it includes a pretty wide emotional spectrum. Because its got roots in punk rock, extreme metal, artsy occult music, classical music, and European folk music there’s a bunch of different stuff “black metal” can be, sonically or emotionally. It superficially mostly sounds similar, but the purposes to which the screeching, static, and blastbeats are used can vary rather widely. I’m not sure you can say that about other metal sub-genres. I’m not aware of any really sad death metal songs or any really meditative thrash anthems.

The protests of the more-trv-than-yv people notwithstanding, bands in the United States have managed to find their own identity in the black metal. The big thing that give USBM its American flavor, as far as I can tell, is that our black metal bands seems to have more of a connection to the culture and the music of alternative rock. We grew up with NIN, Fugazi, Nirvana, etc.  In USBM, sitting next to the blizzard-simulating blastbeats and goblin screams are musical elements that seem inspired less by Mayhem and more by things like industrial music or post rock. We are also a bit less likely to flirt with right wing ideas as a way to get attention. (That’s pretty rare in Europe too, but there is a lot of “panzer” this or that, and every so often somebody says something or other about Jew this or that.)  This seems pretty “American,” as right wing politics are not really thought of as threatening alternatives to liberal hegemony here. We live in a conservative country, and the mainstream right is corporatist twaddle mixed with Evangelical Christianity. (And the extreme right is crazy old men who live in the mountains.)  If you preach the wrong kind of individualism over here, you sound like Carl Rove. We are also a more diverse country and we’ve been through a civil rights movement.

Anywhooo . . . . we tend to be a bit more “punk rock” and less “militant pagan and metal” in our outlook, and we tend to draw musical inspiration more from the artsy underground tradition. In practice that can mean lots of things. This month I got to experience some of those things up close and personal-like.

Agalloch

Agalloch plays a complicated hybrid of folk metal, black metal, and post rock. Their folk melodies always keep them from sounding like Mogwai or something, but their focus on layered guitar textures and careful dynamics can push their music toward sounding like post-rock soundscapes at times. They are probably the least “metal” band that is universally acclaimed (or as close as is possible) by metal people. They also work with a much more subtle emotional palette than most metal bands (or anybody else, really, outside of the best of that alt country stuff that I like). Their songs can shift from melancholy to quiet menace to rage to joy, but the changes are never jarring. Of course, there’s nothing in Agalloch’s music, except for the American attitude, that isn’t forecast in second wave black metal, but they’ve taken parts of what the Scandinavians did, reconsidered it, and made it their own.

Live they are just flat out great. They sound, more or less, just like they do on record (which, given the shifting textures and subtly rising and fallling dynamics of their music, is quite a feat), only they rock a bit more, sometimes because songs are arranged a bit differently, sometimes because the band leans a little harder on their rhythm section, and sometimes because the band works hard to engage the crowd. They aren’t a particularly theatrical band, although they do use dim lighting, nature paraphernalia (stumps as a part of their stage setup, a little alter looking display with candles and an animal skull on the merch table), and incense to set the mood. At certain points in the show, the atmosphere really sets in and you feel like you are out in the woods. There’s plenty of rocking to be had as the music builds toward that feeling.

It took them longer than one would think to go ahead and actually write a song called “falling snow.” Nature is rad.

The Omaha show I saw a couple of week ago consisted of a loooong set that alternated between relatively concise “hits” like “Falling Snow” and “Limbs” and more heady, introspective (and lengthy) compositions like “You Were but a Ghost in My Arms” and “Faustian Echos.” “Faustian Echos” is, of course, their new EP, and the tour was nominally a promotion for that record. It’s a 20 minutes swirl of shifting riffs and raspy singing interspersed with samples of a production of Georthe’s Faust. As an exercise in extended composition, it’s quite impressive, particularly when it blasts off during the second half. This part is meant to convey, I think, the liberation Faust experiences with his satanically derived knowledge. Seeing as how this is Agalloch, the satanic theme is a bit more subtle and mysterious than what one might expect from metal. This isn’t, to name another extended concept piece about deals with the Devil, Dimmu Borgir’s In Sort Diabli, where, “OMG, evil is actually GOOD YOU GUYZ!”  (Don Anderson has a PhD in English, so this subtle, literary approach to Satanism isn’t much of a surprise. It also shouldn’t be a surprise cause that’s how Agalloch rolls. Previous Agalloch albums have included references to Emerson and Thoreau.)

As great as Faustian echos is, and as ambitious as it seems (it is by far the longest and most thematically grandiose piece of music Agalloch have put together), it is something of a throwback. It’s the most “black metal” sounding thing that Agalloch has done since some of their earliest work, with simpler dynamics, more straightfoward metal riffery, blizzard blast beats, and brooding melodic fragments. It’s by no means a step backward, but it does feel like something of a return to core values, particularly after some of the very un-metal music they’ve explored during the past decade. Even though it’s doesn’t break new ground in the way that some of Agalloch’s work has, it’s a very moving, powerful piece of music, even more so live, where the pummeling crescendos can really do their work. That difference, where meditative, introspective music is turned into an exhilarating burst, is the difference between Agalloch on record and Agalloch onstage.

Nachtmystium and Krieg

If “Faustian Echoes” feels like something of a sneaky retrenchment, Nachtmystium’s campaign for Silencing Machine is an explicit one.  Nachtmystium, who is Blake Judd and a revolving cast of Chicago’s best underground metal musicians, spent much of the past half decade making increasingly experimental and un-metal music. The two “Black Meddle” albums never completely abandoned heaviousity, but they incorporated the influence of moody bands like Joy Division, Pink Floyd, and Killing Joke into the music, and at points it seemed like Blake Judd was more interested in post-punk than metal. He even committed the heresy of insisting in interviews that he didn’t really like metal anymore.

Silencing Machine has been advertized as a return to black metal. While that’s an oversimplification (there are still spacy keyboards, weird repetition that seems derived from industrial music, and straight up rock and roll backbeats), this is a more streamlined and more viscous record than anything Nachtmystium has done in ages.

The real advantage of this return to basics is not so much that it returns Nachtmystium to it’s pre “Meddle” roots, but that it closes the gap between the trippy experementalists Nachtmystium have been on record and the brutal animal that Nachtmystium is onstage. One of the bands biggest problems during the past few years is that they have depended heavily on studio members, most notably keyboardist/electonic wiz kid Sanford Parker. As wonderful as some of the results of these collaborations have been, they have sometimes threatened to turn Nachtmystium into an experimental collective that plays dark pop music instead of a touring metal band. Silencing Machine doesn’t renounce the contributions of these players (and Sanford Parker contributes wonderfully, if more subtly, to the album), but it does return the band toward playing fast, brutal music that focuses on black metal guitar riffs.

Perhaps its a part of the band’s “back to our roots” campaign, or perhaps Blake just wanted to hang with his pal Lord Imperial (Blake Judd and Lord Imperial are both important players in the Twilight project), but Nachtmystium could not have found a better partner for their Silencing Machine tour than Krieg. Kreig, a long running USBM band, sits somewhere between a being one man project and a band with a constantly changing line up. For this tour, Krieg is Lord Imperial and the three touring members of Nachtmystium (Blake, Charlie Fell, and Andrew Markuszewski). Where Nachtmystium’s experiments have led them far outside of metal, Krieg has worked to find ever harsher ways of crafting queasy, nihilistic music. Krieg might be pegged as a uber-traditional black metal band, but Imperial has worked hard to find new ways to express hostility, and his restlessness deserves comparison to bleak experimental one man projects like Xasthur and Leviathan. (Those dudes are, of course, also Twilight participants.)

Ug. That is nasty.

Krieg is a great touring partner for Nachtmystium because they emphasize that Nachtmystium is a black metal band while demonstrating that not all black metal bands are the same.  Where Krieg is a barrage of sinister melodies and thundering noise (and blood curdling screams. . . . man, that dude is a monster onstage), Nachtmystium is a rock and roll band. One key difference is a switch in the drum seat. Andrew, Nachtmystium’s guitarist, plays drums in Krieg, and the sturm and drang of his playing is a bit different from Charlie Fell’s more groove oriented stye. (They are both very good drummers. Judging by his performance with Krieg, I’d say Charlie is a good bass player as well.) Nachtmystium played a set heavily weighted to their oldest work mixed with some Silencing Machine stuff (I counted exactly one song from the “Meddle” albums, a scuffed-up version of “Addicts”), and while they were obviously going for a more “black metal” feeling than they have during the past few years, their version of “black metal” has swagger than is very different from Krieg’s desolate cacophony. Lord Imperial (who I found to be a nice guy when I chatted with him for a bit) wore black doc martins and a sleeveless militaristic black shirt. Blake wore cowboy boots and a denim patch covered vest. That’s two pretty different ideas of “black metal.”

It was a big deal that Sanford Parker was there for Roadburn in 2012. According to the band, the difficulty getting all five of them dudes on the same tour was a motivation for moving in a more guitar oriented direction. Why make music you can’t perform live? 

Wrapping it up

This is in no way a summary of all the action going on in USBM, and I’ve hardly mentioned some of the most controversial high profile experiments or the tensions between the “hipster” point of view and the “metal” point of view. In the cases of bands discussed here, that tension, when it’s popped up, has been an absolutely healthy one, but some folks are less enthusiastic about Liturgy, and even Wolves in the Throne Room has gotten some flack. I also haven’t talked about some of the more brutal stuff like Black Anvil or Goatwhore (who present themselves as one of the most approachable, amicable metal bands around). I’ve mentioned, but haven’t explored, the phenomenon of non-touring “depressive” black metal bands. (Not strictly an American phenomena, but there is a lot of that here, particularly in the wake of Xasthur’s success. “A lot” and “Success” are, of course, relative.)

But this post is long enough. I think I’ve started to hint at the richness, diversity and the, well, Americanness of USBM. There’s a lot happening in extreme metal these days, and this is a pocket that I’m particularly interested in. I feel lucky that it’s so close to home.

Adios for now.

Nachtmystium ist rad.

When I first began, with the help of the internet, really taking the plunge into extreme metal, one of the first bands that really caught my attention was Nachtmystium. I’d been into way into some of the cornerstones of metal like Maiden, Slayer, Motorhead, Sabbath, etc. since junior high, but I hadn’t really had the resources to get much deeper than that.

With the rise of sites like Youtube and Pandora, I started exploring, and immediately got sucked into two subgenres: techy grindy-sounding post hardcore stuff (a.k.a. metalcore and deathcore, except six years ago when that stuff wasn’t so strongly associated with trendy horseshit) and black metal. The former I liked because it was. . . well . . . . really sonically extreme and viscerally exciting. Although I haven’t listened to the Acacia Strain in a long time, it’s easy for me to get why people like them. I’d make a point to see them live, except that I have a feeling that I’d spend all my time dodging 15 year-olds doing air karate.

(What in the hell is that silly dancing about anyway? Kids. Being a 300 pound adult can be frustrating sometimes. It’d totally not be cool for me to play pit enforcer as it’d be creepy and mean for me to attack teenagers. I’d be happy to throw somebody ELSE at the calisthenics brigade though. I don’t encounter them very often, fortunately. Digression over.)

“RAAAAAAAWWWRRRRRRR,” says the guy in the hipster glasses and ironic baseball cap. People who know me IRL know that I have no room to talk about those fashion choices.

While my metalcore jones has faded away along with the quality of the scene, my black metal fixation has become more or less a permanent part of my life. Part of it is that black metal is an emotionally broader genre than most extreme metal. Part of it is that different permutations of, and precursors to, “black metal” have been a part of underground music since the 60s, so it’s a particularly rich tradition. (Coven anyone?) Part of it is that black metal is seriously engaged in a postmodern occult tradition that incorporates pop culture, no-paganism, and bits of different religions together. So there’s a lot going on there.

One of the first bands that I really “got” was Nachtmystium. (The others were Darkthrone, Emperor, and oddly enough, Sargeist.) Their trademark combination of psychedelic spaciness and melancholic ugliness just hit my pleasure receptors just right. Since then, I’ve enjoyed watching them experiment and get farther and farther out there, and I’m even more excited about their recent decision to retrench and make more straightforward, aggressive music. They explored some strange frontiers where they discovered weird new stuff, and they have returned to the fold, new knowledge in hand. Even when they moved away from raw, traditional pagan-oriented black metal toward screwy sounding psychedelic new wave songs about personal experiences, they always kept some of that nature/magic spirit, even when they focused their attention on urban grime (sometimes causing people to speculate about their health. . . hugs not drugs, guys). While they are often linked to other great progressive American black metal bands like Wolves in the Throne Room and Agalloch (particularly because there’s a noticeable post-punk influence in their music), they are their own weird, distinctive thing. And it’s a powerful, occasionally even beautiful, thing.

The occasion for this post is that they are about to hit the road for a little jaunt and they are about to put out a new record. I’m going to check out the show and pick up the album later this week, and I’m pretty stoked about both. So all hail them dudes.

U.S.A.! U.S.A!

Bathory. It feels good just to say it.

Bathory is the greatest extreme metal band of all time.

Why?

They (Quarthon and a revolving cast of other folks, including a certain drummer who went on to direct Madonna videos) were the first extreme metal band to take extreme metal seriously, and were the first band to firmly go beyond thrash. They also pioneered musical ideas that other bands latched onto and made into whole new sub-genres. Since you are in front of a damn computer and can presumably use Google, I won’t explain the deets of what Bathory’s music was about, except to remind you that they started off as, more or less, an occult obsessed hardcore punk band (we now call that “old school black metal”), and they evolved into a band that recorded epics about Scandinavian history (we now call that “folk metal”).

As substantial as all that is, that doesn’t put them over the top.

The reason they are the greatest metal band of all time was the punk spirit undergirding the whole thing. Quarthon was a kid who was into Motorhead and some obscure European hardcore punk, and through some coincidences, he was invited to contribute to a compilation of tracks from local bands. It was unbelievable crude, but (actually, “so” would be a better conjunction here) it immediately caught the attention of the kids who bought the thing. So he got invited to make a whole album like that, and then another one, and then he started to evolve, and so forth and so on.

One of the most beautiful (to metal ears) things about Bathory’s music is that you can often hear Quarthon straining at the edge of his abilities and resources, and the strain enriches the music. It makes it weird and mysterious. It’s kind of like the way that the DIY thing give great punk rock a certain power and relatability, but it’s different because Bathory is not about community or accessibility. Quorthon was, instead, the ultimate Romantic outsider. Friendly down to earth guy, but no live shows, no compromises, no bullshit. He did what he wanted, even if it seemed to be beyond the scope of what a tiny underground rock project could accomplish, and even if if might alienate his fans. After 1990, he more or less abandoned the extreme sounds that got him an audience in favor of loooong melodic folk metal epics, and he even recorded an alternative rock solo album. (By the way, if he has an heir, it’s Fenriz from Darkthrone. If you don’t like Circle the Wagons, you can fuck right on off. Idiot.)

On Bathory’s earliest music, they were pushing to be the most brutal, extreme band in the world. They certainly sound vicious, but they also sound. . . well, odd and tinny. Compare Bathory’s debut to, to name another young band straining to up the ante, the Nihilist demo.

They didn’t have no money, but they knew what they were doing.

It sounds like Bad Brains being molested by dishwasher. Is that drums under there?

Nihilist manages the speed and violence that they are after with aplomb. They sound like they are going to punch you in throat. You can hear “if this band had a studio, they’d make a brutal, mind blowing album. (And of course, that album is Left Hand Path.)  Bathroy on the other hand, sounds like trebly racket. The effect, though, is not that they are incompetent, but that they are somehow. . .alien. It’s mysterious. Perverse. (I’d say the same about the Hellhammer demos. The best early black metal has an outsider art magic that I’m not sure can be replicated.)

After a little practice, they became able to execute “brutality with an icy metallic guitar” pretty good, but they were ready to move on. To epic music with choirs and Vikings sweeping in and demons and. .  . well. Bigger stuff. I’ll wrap it up with my favorite Bathory song, and one of my favorite songs period. Amateurish singing, faking epic composition with a simple chord progression and a keyboard, 80s drums. . . . but man. It fits, and the oddness of it makes it more powerful, particularly when the churn of the guitars threatens the stately order of the composition.

It’s a little off kilter, but it’s unbelievably perfect.

BOW BEFORE IT!

Metal lyrics and authorship

My buddy just wrote a smart post about whether or not extreme metal lyrics matter since you can’t understand them most of the time anyway. I was mentioned in there:

“My friend is of the opinion that lyrics in black metal are kind of like album covers- they are a part of the overall experience, but not really necessary to understand what’s going on. Instead, paying attention to them can help you grasp the overall concept presented.”

(http://blackmetallurgy.wordpress.com/2012/07/05/are-black-metal-lyrics-important/)

That’s a good summary of what I think, but I want to take a sec to expand that just a bit. The question about how the lyrics in extreme metal work is an interesting one since so many vocalists are so unintelligible. (And Hagalaz did a good job of talking about it.) I’m not talking crappy vocalists either, but some of the best and most distinctive. If anybody claims to be able to follow the bulk of what Mortuus or Barney Greenway say, they are just being pretentious.

I don’t know what he’s saying, but I’m convinced.

I think that the way to think about lyrics when they are not intelligible is, as Hagalaz says, to consider them a part of the overall presentation, like the packaging, liner notes, videos, etc. They help you to understand to a greater or lesser degree what the point of the music is.

Let’s go a tad further though. . . . lyrics are a part of the surrounding material that helps us to construct an idea not only of what the point of a particular song is, but to construct an idea of who the author is. Like, we don’t have to necessarily know the lyrics of a particular song, but if we are aware of the kinds of topics that a particular band writes about, then we have an idea of how to interpret the music.

For example, if this were a Deathspell Omega song (or, more likely a section of a DsO song that leads into an organ part or someone vomiting or a children’s choir or something), we’d instantly draw different conclusions about how we might feel about it:

“Hmmm. . . is this an example of Spazzy angst or existential chaos? Well, who’s it by? Converge? Spazzy angst it is!”

Incidentally, parts of DsO’s new EP have been compared by quite a few critics to mathcore-ish post hardcore like Converge and Dillinger Escape Plan.

The New Dillnger Escape Plan record is terryfying!

I’m not claiming there aren’t sonic differences between Converge and the Converge-like parts on the new DsO record. Clearly Converge is coming with more straightforward, post-hardcore aggression, and DsO is using more dissonance and using spooky black metal vocals and putting those frantic bits into larger compositions. But knowing something about the kinds of things that those bands talk about helps get a grasp of what’s going on a lot faster, and it guides how we think about some of the musical devices being used. Like, somebody screaming over a weird time signature might mean a bunch of stuff. Knowing something about the topics that a band talks about can help to sort it out faster.

In my first big post on the new blog I talked a bit about Foucault’s author function. Foucault argued that we constructed an idea of an author’s personality so that we could more easily interpret their work. We think of Ernest Hemingway as a macho individualist who was responding to cultural and political events in pre-WWII Europe, and having that idea of him helps us to accept some interpretations of his books and reject others. So, if you read The Sun Also Rises as a metaphor about Buddha, I’m going to say you are wrong, wrong, wrong, because that doesn’t fit with who we understand Hemingway to be.

Oddly enough, in extreme metal, the lyrics themselves are sometimes more useful for helping to construct an idea of who the band is than they are for adding very much to the experience of the song. (Remember kids, I said LYRICS, not VOCALS.)

This is, oddly enough, particularly true in a lot of black metal songs, where the lyrics are suggestive or evocative more than really descriptive. I’m not sure what a “black wizards” is exactly, or who Natasha is in that Darkthrone song (or why she is so sleepy), but the lyrics help me to put together a picture of what the image the bands were after at the time, and so I have a better idea of what the music is supposed to accomplish. To some degree, there is always that feedback loop between the author function and the actual work, but in metal, that loop is kinda odd. Or at least, it’s different from other pop music, where the actual words are a bigger part of the experience. Much ink has been spilled about how black metal was lyrically more sophisticated and serious than the metal that came before. I think that’s true, but I don’t think we’ve really though much about what that means, particularly since the lyrics are often not important to the effect the music has, and since so many of the best black metal songs are lyrically a bit clumsy or pretentious. (“Cosmic Keys to the what now? And there are exceptions. One of my favorite black metal records from the past few years is “Waters of Ain,” which has really moving, and more or less intelligible, lyrics.)  ) Sophistication, in this case, has something to do with lyrics that are evocative but open-ended accompaniment for the music. Exploring how that that sophistication works would be an interesting project for somebody (else).

A few wiseasses from the fringe between metal and alternative rock have pushed this point I’m making by writing records with nonsense lyrics or with vocals that are just phoenetic sounds. The Melvins in particular have had a lot of making up lyrics about the meaninglessness of the song.

“The nature of the burning beast Means nothing to no-one?” I think they are trying to tell you something.

Of course in that case, the lack meaning is still a part of that author function jazz. Like, the Melvins might sound a lot like stoner metal, but they sure don’t present themselves like any kind of “metal” band, and they don’t sing about witches and pot and stuff.

And just because I really like the Melvins, here are some Melvins helping Mike Patton do some lyricless vocal fun:

Mike Patton is a genius. Although it’s hard to tell when he’s putting us on.

Ask and ye shall recieve

So I started this blog up by re-editing a post from my old blog that was a little think piece about, more or less, how I liked Abigail Williams’s music well enough but they needed to work on having a stronger identity.

One of the big pieces of metal news today (well below the Randy Blythe thing) was that they were breaking up, but that they would be putting out new music in different new bands. Since it’s been a revolving door situation with those dudes (and so whoever owns the name could keep putting out different albums and calling it Abigail Williams), they seem to be doing what they oughta do. Scrap Abigail Williams and put that musical talent to use in something that’s better defined. I wish them well as they move forward, as I’ve enjoyed what they’ve done so far, derivative as it has sometimes been. (But hey, it’s metal. A lot of good stuff is way derivative.)

I’ll be checking them out on their farewell tour. I recommend that you do as well as them people play good, atmospheric metal. (The local openers where I live will be rad also.)

7/26 Santa Barbara, CA @ Muddy Waters
7/27 Mexicali, CA @ TBA
7/28 Los Angeles, CA @ The Black Castle
7/29 Temecula, CA @ The Vault
7/30 Tempe, AZ @ The Rogue Bar
7/31 Las Vegas, NV TBA
8/3 Salt Lake City, UT TBA
8/4 Prince, UT @ house show!
8/5 Denver, CO @ Old Curtis St Bar
8/7 Midland, TX @ Pine Box
8/8 Fort Worth, TX @ Tomcats West
8/9 Austin, TX TBA
8/10 San Antonio, TX @ Zombies
8/11 Houston, TX @ Numbers
8/12 Baton Rough, LA@ Here Today Gone Tomorrow
8/13 New Orleans, LA @ Siberia
8/14 Tampa, FL TBA
8/15 Miami, FL TBA
8/16 Satellite Beach, FL @ Wynfields
8/17 Orlando, FL @ Bombshells
8/18 Columbus, GA @ The Plughouse
8/19 TBA
8/20 Johnson City,TN @ Hideaway
8/21 Roanoke, VA @ Coffin House
8/22 Baltimore, MD @ Talking Head
8/23 Frederick, MD @ Cafe 611
8/24 Pittsburgh, PA @ Smiling Moose
8/25 Columbus, OH @ The Shrunken Head
8/26 Lansing, MI @ Blackened Moon
8/27 Chicago, IL @ Ultra Lounge
8/28 Louisville, KY TBA
8/29 Nashville, TN TBA
8/30 Birmingham, AL @ The Nick
9/1 Kansas City, MO @ The Riot Room
9/2 Quincy, IL @ The State Room
9/3 St. Louis, MO @ Fubar
9/4 Des Moines, IA The House of Bricks
9/5 Milwaukee, WI @ Port of Hamburg
9/6 St Paul, MN TBA
9/7 Fargo, ND TBA
9/9 Billings, MT TBA
9/10 camping yellowstone
9/11 camping yellowstone
9/12 Boise, ID TBA
9/13 Spokane, WA TBA
9/14 Seattle, WA TBA
9/15 Portland, OR TBA

The Abigail Wiliams Problem

What is the “Abigail Williams problem”? It is the “authenticity question” as it applies to extreme metal.

Abigail Williams is an American extreme metal band who are eyed somewhat suspiciously by some metal people. They are a musically adept band who has made three good records, and they deliver onstage. I saw them open for Mayhem, and they sounded really good. I met one of them dudes outside the venue (I think I got a light from him), and he was a perfectly sincere little metal geek. The idea that they should be regarded as less than credible seems a little odd to anybody outside of the metal world. They work hard, tour a lot, and make good records. I’m going to see them this fall. Should be rad. I like their new record.

But they’ve got the Abigail Williams problem, which has two parts:

1. They have switched styles on each record. They haven’t, like, progressed through different styles in an organic way or responded to different trends by appropriating some aspects of contemporary music into what they are doing. They’ve just up and switched what they sound like each time.

Their first album was the mainstream American metal sounding thing with some black metal. Their second album was symphonic black metal a la Dimmu Borgir. That was strange enough in an of itself. That choice was more eyebrow raising for some since not many American bands do that, and when they do it seems like they have to worry about the credibility thing, since it seems like they are just ripping off popular European metal from a few years back. (Massakren, a really young unsigned band that I like a lot gets slagged off for this also.) Their latest record sounds like underground American black metal, particularly the northwestern stuff like Wolves in the Throne Room and Agalloch

2. They aren’t scary or weird and they don’t have anything occult of controversial to say. They look like ordinary dudes (although hairier and more pierced), and they seem perfectly chill. (Incidentally, they’ve had a lot of lineup changes, which accounts for some of the changes to their sound. The lineup changes themselves aren’t a big deal to anybody, which is a curious feature of underground metal.)

Image

I don’t know which of these people is still in the band, but you get the point. Note the lack of pig’s blood.

Essentially, the problem is that they are very clearly a musically gifted young band trying to find an identity as a rock and roll band in a genre that values authenticity above craft. It’s a very strange problem, as black metal is extremely theatrical and contrived. The most “authentic” black metal bands, mind you, are the ones who wear scary costumes onstage, use elaborate theatrical tricks, take inspiration from fantasy literature, and perform under creepy pseudonyms.

Image

Watain always goes for a natural, unfussy stage presentation.

Let’s consider Gorgoroth. They are a band whose name comes from Tolkien and whose stage show comes from horror movies and KISS videos. They get an authenticity pass because 1. they are very extreme, both sonically and lyrically, 2. band members have committed actual serious crimes, and 3. they are serious occultists- at least in public.

One some level, the “Abigail Williams problem” is stupid. If Gorgorth is clearly doing some kind of performance (except for their participation in assaults and other unsavory bullshit), this whole issue is stupid.

But then again. . .

Their new album, which is also their best by a wide margin, sounds a whole lot like bandwagoneering. The atmospheric, folk influenced music they are making these days sounds very much like music that has been bouncing around the American underground for a few years now and is just now becoming trendy. Wolves in the Throne Room are nowhere near the mainstream, but during the past year or so they have gotten noticed by outlets like NPR, Salon, and the NYT. The new Abigail Williams also sound nothing like the music they’ve made up until now. This is fishy.

Underground music seems special, in part, because it represents various alternative approaches to engaging popular culture. This music is, in part, about ideas. To some degree, it’s about tribal loyalty (which is why well executed death metal that is proudly derivative of music made in 1991 will always be okay with pretty much everybody who listens to metal), but it’s also about staking out some slightly new space as a gesture of resistance to mainstream pop culture. Wolves in the Throne Room is awesome because it’s wonderfully composed and viciously performed metal that offers similar rock and roll kicks as, say, Napalm Death, but it’s also awesome because it represents (in the regular sense of the word, but in the sense of “signaling”) a difference from other pop music. In the case of ecologically oriented Northwestern black metal like WITTR (or Agalloch, for that matter) this sense of difference is a big part of why fans cling so tightly to this music. For a band to come along and treat their accomplishment as a new “style” for musicians looking to claw their way toward the top of the bill as they tour mid-level rock clubs is a little bit unsettling.

Of course, this isn’t Abigail Williams fault. They are learning in public and going through different phases, dropping and adding band members and switching allegiances withing their genre, just as most young bands do. Nirvana was a Melvins knock off, then a Jesus Lizardy noise band, and then a spiffy little punk pop band before they hired a drummer that tied all those tangents together and helped them figure out how to be “Nirvana.” I’m glad to see Abigail Williams evolve; or to go through punctuated equilibrium. Although I do hope they stick with this and evolve a bit more organically in their ongoing quest to figure out what they are. It’s hard to advocate for a band that doesn’t have much of an identity.

Their are really two ways of looking at this. One way is to take the Foucault book off the shelf and look up “author function.” Foucault argued that the “author” that we as readers deal with is no the human who wrote a text, but a constructed effort at a coherent figure that we can use to organize our interpretation of a text. We look at a “body of work” by excluding some things that seem inconsistent, and we use literary biography to construct a story that helps us with our task. This is a process that is initiated by the artist (in some cases self consciously, and in some cases not) and carried further by editors, marketers, and critics.

The fact that Abigail Williams doesn’t really “work” as an author doesn’t mean their records aren’t good. If you just changed the name of the band for each or their three records, it wouldn’t matter: “There’s this new atmospheric black metal band that has some of the dudes form Abigail Williams in it!” If Abigail Williams got more consistent, their music might become more interesting because you could meaningfully compare their records with each other as a way of understanding them. So, pretensions of authenticity aside, there is a real loss when a good band fails to find a strong voice, but it’s nothing to get upset about.

A rock band is, in some ways, the ultimate demonstration of the “author function.” The “Rolling Stones” contain a lot of stuff that was not produced by anybody who was ever a member of the band, and the members of the band have changed a lot. Chuck Leavell has been, more or less, a member of the Rolling Stones for over a decade. He doesn’t write much material, but neither does Ron Wood. There is plenty of what is essentially solo material on Rolling Stones records also. It’s a brand. So were the Fugs, and so is Wolves in the Throne Room. It’s more than a brand though, as it provides a mechanism for comparing and categorizing their music. It’s a part of their art. What’s more interesting: the journey of a band through several decades of different efforts as defining themselves, or a massively inconsistent collection of rootsy rock and roll?

The other way to look at this is to argue that the specific kind of music that Abigail Williams has switched to on their new record is politicized music that has a strong spiritual dimension (eco-whathaveyou), and to simply appropriate it as a way to find new compositional material is gross because it undermines the seriousness with which their fore-bearers took the task of innovating within a form so that pop music could respond to the world. (Of course, plenty of people dislike American black metal bands because they are not pure and misanthropic and have therefore undermined the intentions of people like Varg Vikernes. I love his music, but let’s all say it together: “fuck Varg Vikernes.”)

I personally don’t have a strong opinion about how I “should” feel about Abigail Williams, but the mild controversy that surrounds them is interesting. For me they are a promising band that I can’t quite engage with that strongly because they haven’t established who they are. This a band who is working to figure themselves out from within underground metal, and this is a band that is building an audience the old fashioned way- the tour bus. In my mind their are a perfectly legitimate young band that is in a weird position because they got a record deal, and presumably some measure of tour support, before they were fully formed. I don’t have any sort of emotional attachment to them, but they are a perfectly good band.

If they were switching styles as a way to cash in on some underground style that had been discovered in a serious way by the mainstream, and if their music were just empty stylish gestures, I’d hate them no matter how well they played. It’d be like Bush, the worst of the Nirvanabes and an absolute disgrace. Bush was all style. Well executed, but empty, incoherent flash that was held together with production tricks and guitar hooks. (Their least terrible songs tended to be their loudest.) Dreadful.

My point, and here it is, settle down, is that Abigail Williams isn’t like Bush. Even if they don’t have an identity as a band, their songs do “work” as more than just impressions of other songs, and their music is getting more sophisticated and subtle all the time. All this is to say that the “Abigail Williams problem” is interesting not so much because of what it says about Abigail Williams, but because of the way it lays bare a lot of the contrivances that keep us attached to our various pop culture tribes. I like having pop culture tribes, but boy, do they start to seem illusory when somebody comes along who acts like they just might be in show business.

If I cared very much about indie rock this would be the “Lana Del Ray problem,” but I don’t.